Winning the battle with Cancer! Why are so many Dying PT1.

[megabuff]

Please take the time to really read this report thoroughly as it
contains vital information on health you will not find easily
obtainable from other publications.

If you weren't aware of the carcinogens and POISONS in your
everyday personal care items then these reports will shock you!

Please READ ON!



Learn critical health secrets the giant vested interests don't
want you to know!

This new information may save your life.... but only if you put
it into practice! To fully understand the significance of what
is contained in these reports requires some basic knowledge.

Let's begin by reviewing the way cancer is treated in North
America, the UK and most "developed" countries today.

One of the most frightening things a person can hear from their
doctor is, "you have cancer". This is because we all know people
who have been affected by this terrible disease. We may have
friends or family members who have suffered and died from
cancer. We may also know people who have contracted cancer and
survived, but we also know the price some of them paid in
chemotherapy induced illness and hair loss, in physical
disfigurement from surgery, or in side effects from radiation
treatments

The purpose of these reports is not to scare you, nor is it to
provide medical advice. Ultimately, only you can decide what is
best for you whether you are trying to prevent cancer or if you
already have cancer and are seeking treatment.

To make good decisions, you must first have good information.

Would you agree...

Informed people make informed decisions?

If you want to reduce your chance of getting cancer, you must
know something of what may cause cancer. You must know how you
can minimize your potential exposure and how you can support
your body's natural abilities to protect itself from cancer.

In this report, we will attempt to provide some of that
information.

The first step will be to expose a few myths

MYTH #1: We are winning the battle with cancer, and survival
rates are much better today than in the past.

False!

Cancer has become AN EPIDEMIC... effecting massive numbers of
people in all social and economic groups. It is now the 2nd
leading cause of death in North America, Australia and the UK.
Death from cancer is exceeded only by heart disease.

The American Cancer Society says that 1 in 2 of all men and 1 in
3 of all women in our country today will develop some form of
cancer in their lifetime. This is a massive increase over the 1
person in 80 who contracted cancer 100 years ago. Due to the
huge numbers of people dying in the USA from all degenerative
diseases, not just cancer, life expectancy is being revised
downward for the first time ever by medical researchers.

According to the NEJM report, studies suggest that two-thirds of
American adults are overweight. One study cited by the authors
indicates that the prevalence of obesity in U.S. adults has
increased about 50 percent per decade since 1980.

Additional research has shown that people who are severely obese
live up to 20 years less than people who are not overweight and
are much more prone to contracting cancer. Some researchers have
estimated that obesity causes about 300,000 premature deaths in
the U.S. annually. In addition, obesity is fueling an epidemic
of type 2 diabetes, which also reduces lifespan and is the cause
of many debilitating diseases and blindness.

Life expectancy in the USA is now at a high of 77.6 years. If
the researchers' predictions hold true in the next 50 years, it
would be the first reversal in life expectancy since the
government started keeping track in 1900.

This year, about 1,200,000 new cancer cases will be diagnosed in
the USA alone, with hundreds of thousands more in the UK and in
Australia and other Western countries. When added to the
millions who already have cancer, the anticipated loss of life
easily exceeds 1,000,000 per year. (Over 1,500 people in the
U.S. alone die every day from cancer.)

In spite of massive investments in research, cancer rates are
increasing markedly among all age groups, including children,
whose rate of increase is nearly 1% per year according to the
American Cancer Institute. In some parts of the world, cancer
already affects 1 in every 2 people, and the trend continues to
get worse.

Eventually the rate could approach 100%

Although small improvements have occurred in treating some
cancers, the overall rate of recovery for cancer patients has
changed very little over the past 50 years. The average cancer
survival rate was about 50% in 1950, and it is still about 50%
today. For African-Americans, the survival rate in 1950 was
under 40%, and it also remains about the same today.

MYTH #2: Chemotherapy is very effective in treating cancer and
in saving the lives of cancer victims.

False!

Over the years, many dramatic claims have been made by
pharmaceutical companies and other members of the cancer
establishment regarding drug based treatments for cancer. Today,
chemotherapy is the most common form of cancer treatment. If
such successful results were actually being achieved,
improvements could readily be observed in the survival rates.
Yet, survival rates remain basically unchanged.

Chemotherapy consists of a mixture of highly toxic drugs which
are given the patient in a series of treatments over a period of
time. Research shows that chemotherapy can often cause a partial
or even complete shrinkage of a tumour, although this shrinkage
does not necessarily prolong expected survival.

In fact, studies have found that the cancer often returns even
more aggressively than before, because the chemotherapy has
created more resistant cells. In addition, a strongly negative
side effect of chemo is that it can severely damage the body's
immune system as well as the kidneys and liver. Some patients
will die from these complications alone. It is often a case of
the cure being far more serious and deadly then the disease.

A good indication of the effectiveness of chemotherapy can be
found in polls surveying cancer doctors regarding what they
would choose for themselves if they were diagnosed with cancer.
Many US doctors have stated they would not choose chemotherapy
for themselves due to its ineffectiveness and its unacceptable
levels of toxicity. Sixty percent of doctors who responded to a
similar poll in the UK indicated that they would not submit
themselves to chemotherapy!

Still, doctors continue to administer chemotherapy because they
do not have approved medical alternatives. The fact is, there
are large profits to be made by the drug companies in
administering chemotherapy, whether it is actually effective or
not.

If you found this information to be of interests, keep watching
as I will post more factual hype free information about the
myths concerning cancer and other health issues soon.

[megabuff]

Here is a second report in the series of ten
about Toxic Chemicals and the role they play in the onset of
Cancer. I hope you enjoyed reading my first report.

Let's explode some more myths about health and cancer!

MYTH #3:

If I am sick or injured - I want to be in the hospital where I
know I will be well taken care of!

We have wonderful facilities in most Western countries housing
the latest in medical equipment and staffed with highly educated
and dedicated professionals. When we need to go to the hospital,
we are certainly glad they are there. Medical science has
advanced incredibly and now doctors are able to carry out some
truly amazing high tech surgery and repair work. This is an area
where Western medicine certainly excels. However, statistics
show us there is a very significant danger associated with being
a hospital patient.

In 1993, Ralph Nader's consumer watchdog organization
released its findings from a three year study of American
hospitals. They reported that an astounding 300,000 people
die each year in hospitals due to errors in diagnosis,
treatment, medication, surgery, and other forms of medical
malpractice. The Journal of the American Medical
Association, in its July 2000 issue, confirmed the figure at a
conservative 250,000 deaths per year and this was compiled by
medical people!

In fact, the figure could be far higher as reported by By Gary
Null PhD, Carolyn Dean MD ND, Martin Feldman MD, Debora Rasio
MD, Dorothy Smith PhD in an extensive research paper they have
written. By their estimates up to almost 1 million - yes that is
right - ONE MILLION deaths can be attributed in the USA to
medical error and improper use of medical drugs. You can
read this report on Dr Mercola's website. Click on the link
below or copy and paste it into the browser.
http://www.mercola.com/2004/jul/7/healthcare_death.htm

This means that in American hospitals, by
conservative estimates, medical errors kill five times as many
people each year as there was American service personnel killed
in the entire Vietnam war. And those service people were dodging
bullets!

UK and Australia and in virtually all other "developed"
countries are following very close behind the American example.
When you think about this, it doesn't give you much comfort if
you do have to rely on medical treatment in a hospital at some
time in the future.

Even when prescription drugs are properly administered, there
are dangers involved, whether or not you are in a hospital.
Millions of Americans have harmful reactions to prescription
drugs every year, and a conservative estimate is 100,000 of
those reactions result in death. Obviously, the best way to
eliminate the dangers associated with hospitalization and
prescription drugs is to take better care of yourself. Stay
healthy and avoid accidents, toxic chemicals and poisons, and
you will not need either drugs or hospitalization hopefully. It
really does make a lot of sense to carry out preventative
maintenance with your health, rather than try to put the wheels
back on when they have fallen off.

I class good health a bit like the maintenance needed to keep a
motor car in good order as it ages. When was the last time you
gave your car a thorough service? Changed the oil and the oil
filter, checked the brakes and tires and generally carried out a
regular inspection and some tender loving care. For most of us
it is generally accepted if we don't do this with our cars, then
one day the "wheels are going to fall off" and the car will be a
wreck.

Well, it isn't that much different for your body. When was
the last time you had a thorough look at what you are doing with
your diet and the toxic chemicals you are exposing yourself to
via skin care products and toiletries and the food you eat etc?
Last week? Last year? Never? If not why not? What about the
stress and chemicals you are exposed to in the work place? You
wouldn't dream of doing that with your car would you? Keep on
running it without any thought of tomorrow or next year, just
keep it rolling until the wheels fall off!

You know, your health it is much harder to fix when it breaks
down than your car would ever be! If you had carried out some
simple preventative maintenance in the first place perhaps there
wouldn't be some major disaster. Does this make sense to you? It
sure makes sense to me to maintain good health rather than place
your life in the hands of professionals who specialize in
palliative treatments. That is, treating the symptoms of disease
rather than preventing the disease in the first place.

My doctor always knows what is best for me.

NOT NECESSARILY

Paul Winter, author of "The Cancell Home Page", writes: "It is
not likely that any doctor knowingly suppresses a cancer cure to
protect his business or career. But every doctor has his or her
own ideas about the best treatment based on what they have
learned. The pharmaceutical companies however have an extremely
strong influence over what medical doctors are taught.

Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of cancer
treatments, so they assume that what they were taught in school
or what is demonstrated in the pages of briefing journals is the
best treatment. They cannot afford to suspect that these
treatments are only best for the pharmaceutical companies that
influence their institutions of higher learning."

Dr. John Diamond and Dr. Lee Cowden, in their book titled
Alternative Medicine: The Definitive Guide to Cancer, gave this
scathing indictment of the cancer industry:

"To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit
centre. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not
support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer
treatments are in place as the law of the land, not because they
heal the best, but because they pay the best. Decades of the
politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and
will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality."

Question:

Why is it that the scandals concerning cancer treatment remain
muted?



Answer:

Mostly because doctors have not yet fully realized the
fraudulent nature of the cancer industry and and the greed of
vested interests which drives it.

Paul Winter explains: "Even if you have the best doctors, their
information about alternative cancer treatments is probably
incorrect. Doctors are so busy that they must rely on the
summaries of medical research or testing. These summaries are
usually prepared by institutions that oppose alternative
treatments. If you carefully research other alternative cancer
treatments, you will find the same kind of disinformation. How
and why this happens is thoroughly explained in the book, The
Cancer Industry, by Dr. Ralph Moss."

Well that is all in this report... keep an eye out for the 3rd
report - all the best for now.

[megabuff]

MYTH #5: Massive research is underway to determine how to
prevent cancer. FALSE: Cancer is the basis for a huge
industry dominated by very large corporations that exist for the
primary purpose of earning profits and creating dividends for
stockholders. In the U.S. alone, cancer is a $200 billion per
year industry. There are more people in the UK, Australia,
Canada and the USA, earning a living from cancer than currently
dying from it each year. This trend even though the cancer rate
is continuing to escalate looks set to continue. The simple
facts of the matter are that a lot of money is being made in the
"Cancer Industry" and will continue to be made for a very long
time yet. Eliminating cancer or dramatically reducing the
procedures required to treat cancer would create a very large
economic loss for the "Cancer Industry" with the loss of many
thousands of jobs. It is very sad to think possibly millions of
lives could have been saved if proper, fully funded research was
poured into cancer prevention and the education of the public,
rather than pouring the money down the drain into this highly
profitable, palliative care industry. There are two main sources
of funding for cancer related research in the United States.
The largest is the National Cancer Institute, which distributes
about $3 Billion of tax money for cancer research annually. Of
this huge sum, only 2-3% is allocated to researching the
prevention of cancer. The other organization funding cancer
research is the American Cancer Society, which collects about
$700 Million in donations annually. However, they spend
virtually NOTHING on cancer prevention. Pharmaceutical
companies, which fund their own research, have ABSOLUTELY NO
INCENTIVE to research cancer prevention, because all the profit
potential is in treating cancer and not in preventing it. You
may be shocked to learn, at the time of writing, that officers
and directors of pharmaceutical companies, petrochemical
companies, and tobacco companies serve as officers, board
members, or directors of some of the largest cancer research
organizations. Some are either current or former directors of
the American Cancer Society also. From these positions of
power, they are able to guide and control how cancer research
money is spent. To understand how vested interests work, you
really need to read this in depth report on a page at
http://bodiorganic.com/cannot_trust.htm. I'm sure after you have
read the report you will have quite a different view of the
fundamentals of big business. Despite massive evidence that
cancer is a metabolic disease which can be effectively treated
with specialized nutritional therapy, and despite extensive
documentation over many years of numerous cancer types
responding extremely favorably to nutrition based protocols,
there is virtually no public or private funding available for
research in this area. In fact, professionals who have spoken
out in presenting such information or who have advocated a
nutritional approach to treating cancer patients have been
ridiculed, slandered, and in some cases, even driven from their
practice. One needs to ask why? The cancer establishment is
opposed to nutrition based cancer treatment for the same reason
it opposes researching cancer prevention. There is no
significant money to be made with either approach.
Pharmaceutical companies' motives are profit driven, and to
control profits, they only market formulas they can patent.
Natural ingredients, as found in nutritional products, cannot be
patented so therefore any treatment involving natural products
is ignored by the vested interests as it would be highly
detrimental for the shareholders profits if a pharmaceutical
company went down this road. Any company director who doesn't
push for the maximum profits to be attained from the company
operations could well find themselves being sued by
shareholders. So it certainly isn't in individual directors
interests to do anything else except to toe the line as far as
ensuring company profits are the mandatory reason for their own
existence. To protect their profitable business of making
patented cancer drugs, their solution, the medical people and
powerful vested interests in collusion with government
departments, has been to harass anyone promoting a non-drug
therapy. Government regulators and leaders of medical
associations who owe much of their existence to the
pharmaceutical companies fall right in line to create a united
front of opposition to virtually all natural approaches to
treating not just cancer, but all metabolic disease in general.
To many, it borders on criminal neglect. Emphasis is on cure -
not prevention One result of this opposition is that the
emphasis in cancer research is almost NEVER on prevention and
always on CURE. The people who are directing cancer research
have a vested interest in keeping the scientists away from the
study of cancer prevention and focused on drug cures that can be
patented, marketed, and huge obscene profits made from them by
the corporations. Some people believe the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is in total collusion with this because
they have set up a system that requires hundreds of millions of
dollars and 10 years or more of testing to get a new drug
approved. (The same protocol is followed in the UK and
Australia) This high cost prohibits all but the few largest and
richest pharmaceutical companies in the world from participating
in the FDA approval process. For individuals or small
companies with limited funding, it is a financial impossibility
to even consider trying to develop an entirely different
protocol for cancer treatment based on a natural approach. It
appears obvious that the cancer establishment is focused on
making huge profits from treating cancer rather than on helping
people with prevention and low cost therapies. If we want to
live healthy disease free lives, then we must each take personal
responsibility for preventing cancer in our lives in the first
place and educating our families and loved ones to the
preventative approach, rather than the cut out and destroy
approach of the medical profession. To do so, we must ask,
"What is cancer, what causes it, and how can it be prevented?"
I will be exploring aspects of prevention in the forthcoming
Articles.

[Analog6]

Yes, this is all known to many of us. The drug companies and multinationals do not want us to be well - how would they then make any money.
And is it any conincindence that the rise in cancers and otehr dieseases has come in the same time scale as the growth in over processed and refined foods? The more chemicals and additives they put in our food the sicker we get. Here is a link to an article from the Australian Medical Journal on using herbal remedioes for cancer and other disease treatment - bnut naturally they cannot get money for research as the drug companies cannot patent herbs!
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185 ... 10806.html
It is extrememly interesting and looks at herbs with relevance for:

. controlling blood sugars and cholesterol in Cardiovascular disease
. replacing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory in relieving the pain of arthritis (ginger instead of ibruprofen!)
. ginger for treating glycaemia in diabetics
. as anti-clotting agents
. protection against cancers (garlic, curcumin, gingerol, capsaicin, turmeric, basil, rosemary, mint, lemon grass, parsley, lavender, cherries and mint).
The cancers cited include lung, breast, colon, skin, forestomach, liver, oral cancer. I know I'd rather eat a herb than take a drug with potentially toxic side effects.

Imagine rosemary for breast cancer, ginger instead of ibuprofen, curcumin, gingerol and capsaicin instead of VIOX!

Why isn't our medical profession investigating treatment with herbs as an adjunct to western medicine. I'm not advocating throwing away all our drugs - but if the doses of drugs with vicious side effects could be reduced if they were teamed with herbals, surely this is good for the patient? The Hippocratic oath (classical version) says "I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. " , so why is harm reduction not the aim of the medical profession, and why do they so rarely apply dietetic measures?

It could surely not be because the drug companies aren't interested in compounds they cannot patent and make billions from, and the fact that they are hand in glove with our medical prfoession and the government?